Dated: 4 June2008 |
Complainant Broadcaster |

Members
Complaint under section 8(1B)(b)(i) of the Broadcasting Act 1989
Hell’s Kitchen: Served Raw – chef Gordon Ramsay said “fucking
Jesus Christ” – allegedly in breach of good taste and decency
Findings
Standard 1 (good taste and decency) – contextual factors – not
upheld
(This headnote does not form part of the decision.)
[1] An episode of Hell’s Kitchen: Served Raw was
broadcast on TV2 at 12.30am on 11 December 2007. The programme revolved around
several aspiring chefs who competed against one another in a knock-out competition
to win a restaurant. It was presented by Gordon Ramsay, a well-known and
hot-tempered chef, who judged the competitors’ performances and sent a
different person home each week. During the episode, Gordon Ramsay frequently
used the word “fuck” to
express his annoyance and frustration, and at one point he said “Fuck
me, fucking Jesus Christ”.
[2] The programme was preceded by the following verbal and visual
warning:
This programme is rated adults only. It contains frequent use of language that may offend some people.
[3] Angus Gibb made a formal complaint to Television New Zealand
Ltd, the broadcaster, alleging that the programme had breached standards of
good taste and decency.
[4] The complainant argued that Mr Ramsay’s statement “fucking
Jesus Christ” was extremely offensive, blasphemous and unacceptable. He
appreciated the fact that Mr Ramsay had said it without malice and at a time
when he was under pressure, but argued that those factors “did not excuse
it”.
[5] TVNZ assessed the complaint under Standard 1 of the Free-to-Air Television Code of Broadcasting Practice. It provides:
Standard 1 Good Taste and Decency
In the preparation and presentation of programmes, broadcasters are responsible for maintaining standards which are consistent with the observance of good taste and decency.
[6] TVNZ stated that to constitute a breach of Standard 1, the
material shown must be unacceptable to a significant number of viewers in the
context in which it was shown. It pointed out that Hell’s Kitchen was
classified AO and that the episode complained about had been broadcast at
12.30am. It argued that the programme was preceded by a warning that “gave
a precise indication of the type of material the programme would contain” and
it believed that viewers had been given ample opportunity to decide if they
wished to watch it.
[7] The broadcaster contended that there was a considerable
expectation by the audience that Gordon Ramsay would use coarse language in
the programme, as he was notorious for both his language and his temper when
in the kitchen. It considered that Mr Ramsay saying “fuck me, fucking
Jesus Christ” was “neither
surprising nor out of context in the rest of the show”.
[8] TVNZ believed that the statement was acceptable in the context
of an AO classified programme broadcast at 12.30am that was preceded by a warning.
The broadcaster declined to uphold the complaint that the programme breached
Standard 1 (good taste and decency).
[9] Dissatisfied with TVNZ’s response, Mr Gibb referred his complaint to the Authority under section 8(1B)(b)(i) of the Broadcasting Act 1989.
[10] Mr Gibb made a further submission maintaining that the language contained in the programme was offensive and blasphemous.
[11] The complainant reiterated his argument that Mr Ramsay’s language breached standards of good taste and decency.
[12] The members of the Authority have viewed a recording of the
broadcast complained about and have read the correspondence listed in the Appendix.
The Authority determines the complaint without a formal hearing.
[13] When the Authority considers a complaint that alleges a breach
of good taste and decency, it is required to take into account the context of
the broadcast. On this occasion the relevant contextual factors include:
- the programme had an AO classification
- the programme was preceded by a verbal and written warning
- the programme was broadcast at 12.30am
- the expectations of regular viewers.
[14] The Authority notes that the definition of the word “Christ” in
the Concise Oxford Dictionary includes “expressing surprise, anger, etc”.
On this occasion, the Authority considers that the phrase “Fuck me, fucking
Jesus Christ” was clearly used by Mr Ramsay as an exclamation of annoyance
and frustration.
[15] The Authority accepts that many people are offended by the
profane use of the words "Christ", "Jesus" and "God". It
also notes that its surveys of public opinion disclose that the community's
views on blasphemy are polarised. The Authority has in the past found
that the use of "Jesus Christ" as an expression of dismay or anger
was acceptable in context (see, for example, Decision Nos 2003-068 and 2005-141).
On this occasion, while it is of the view that coupling the words "Jesus
Christ" with "fucking" made
the phrase more likely to be unacceptable to a greater number of people,
the Authority finds that the 12.30am time of broadcast and warning were
sufficient to avoid a breach of the standard.
[16] Taking the above contextual factors into account, the Authority
declines to uphold the complaint that the programme breached Standard 1 (good
taste and decency).
For the above reasons the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
Joanne Morris
Chair
4 June 2008
The following correspondence was received and considered by the Authority when it determined this complaint:
1. Angus Gibb’s
formal complaint to TVNZ – 12 December 2007
2. TVNZ’s response
to the formal complaint – 30
January 2008
3. Mr Gibb’s
referral to the Authority – 7
February 2008
4. TVNZ’s response
to the Authority – 17
April 2008
5. Mr Gibb’s
further submission – 5
May 2008
6. Mr Gibb’s
final submission – 25
May 2008