BSA Pānui - 11 December 2024

Number 153
Kia ora koutou

As we approach the summer holiday season, I’d like to take this chance to briefly thank you all for your work throughout the year in informing and entertaining audiences and working with us within the co-regulatory broadcasting standards framework.

It has been a year marked with significant challenges and ongoing uncertainty across the industry, but also some noteworthy achievements as the country's broadcasters continue to show their formidable commitment to delivering for audiences. 

It was also pleasing to see some relief this week with news of Government moves to repeal advertising restrictions for broadcasters on Sundays and public holidays.

In this, our last Pānui for the year, you can see the BSA's latest decisions and a brief digest of recent news and research. Our office will be closed from 5pm on Friday 20 December and will reopen in the new year on Monday 6 January.

We wish you and your friends and family a joyful, safe and restful Kirihimete. We look forward to working with you again in 2025.
 
Ngā mihi mahana
Stacey Wood
Chief Executive
FEATURED DECISIONS
OH and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 2024-077 (9 December 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint alleging an RNZ National news bulletin addressing airstrikes in Lebanon breached the balance, accuracy and fairness standards, including by failing to provide context for the airstrikes. The Authority found the broadcast was a simple report on events rather than a ‘discussion’ of issues to which the balance standard might apply. It found listeners were unlikely to get a misleading impression of events from the report and the fairness standard did not apply.

Not Upheld: Balance, Accuracy, Fairness
 

McGlone and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2024-074 (4 December 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld an accuracy complaint about a 1News segment on the dangers of crossing sand bars. In the segment, a Coastguard representative said, ‘We recommend crossing the bar at high or low tide, so we can try and take the current out of the equation’. The complaint alleged the recommendation to cross at low tide was ‘wrong’ and ‘dangerous’ and Coastguard were not an authoritative source regarding maritime matters. The Authority considered there were reasonable arguments for a finding the statement was not materially inaccurate in the context of the broadcast. The segment’s overall emphasis was on the dangers and complexity in crossing sand bars, and the statement addressed just one of several risk factors mentioned. In any event, the Authority found it was reasonable for the broadcaster to rely on information provided by the Coastguard representative on this topic.

Not Upheld: Accuracy

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

New Zealand International

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new