BSA Pānui - BSA responds to new media reform proposals

Number 154
Kia ora koutou

The Government has today launched a public consultation on proposals to reform legislation for media and content production.
 
This is a welcome development. The BSA has long called for and supported moves to modernise regulation that no longer aligns with how content is produced and consumed – as have many broadcasters, media and stakeholders.
 
The Media Reform discussion document proposes New Zealand’s media standards system should cover not just broadcasters, but also streaming platforms and online providers.

It also floats changing the role of the regulator – currently the BSA – so it has a more ‘system-level’ focus with a greater reliance on industry self-regulation.
 
We support the paper’s high-level aims to create a modern, fit-for-purpose regulatory and funding environment, and to support a sustainable media and content production sector.
 
For years we’ve highlighted the increasingly urgent need to update our 35-year-old broadcasting regulations that pre-date the internet.
 
We welcome the ‘platform-neutral’ nature of the proposed system, providing flexibility and future-proofing in view of sweeping changes in how content is produced and consumed. This, and suggested measures making local content more accessible and discoverable, and to increase self-regulation, may help local media to better compete with much bigger global platforms. This, in turn, could help ensure New Zealand stories continue to be told.
 
However, any reform will need to consider the fairest way to address any resulting increase in costs for media.
 
Regardless of the exact shape of any new system, it’s vital from the BSA’s perspective that it continues to protect freedom of expression, while allowing for appropriate limits to prevent harm.
 
We’ll examine the new proposals in detail before making a submission. In doing so, we’ll draw on the BSA’s 35 years of experience as an effective regulator of media content.
 
We also want to hear what broadcasters and those working in New Zealand media think of the proposals. As is often the case with public consultations, the proposals are light on details, and we know there will be different views on the best way to achieve a fair and sustainable media regulation framework that is practical now and for the future.
 
Please get in touch if you have thoughts or concerns you’d like to share.
 
You can see the statement we’ve issued to media welcoming today’s consultation announcement hereopen_in_new.
 
The Media Reform consultation document can be seen on the Ministry for Culture and Heritage website hereopen_in_new.
 
Long-awaited reform of the regulatory landscape will of course take time. Until any new framework is finalised and enacted, we look forward to continuing to work closely with broadcasters and stakeholders on a ‘business-as-usual’ basis.
 
Ngā mihi mahana
Stacey Wood
Chief Executive
FEATURED DECISIONS

Hartstone and NZME Radio Ltd - 2024-082 (28 January 2025) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint that a segment of Fletch, Vaughan and Hayley, discussing the statistic that 20% of New Zealanders admitted to ‘snooping’ on their partners’ devices, breached the discrimination and denigration standard. Following a story about a listener catching her partner cheating using his ‘find my iPhone’, the hosts made brief comments that ‘the gays should run a course’. The complainant considered the segment denigrated people who identify as gay and perpetuated a negative stereotype that gay people are sneaky. In the context, the Authority found the comments were unlikely to encourage different treatment of gay people to their detriment or devalue the reputation of gay people.

Not Upheld: Discrimination and Denigration


Beck and Television New Zealand Limited - 2024-084 (18 December 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint that a segment on Seven Sharp breached the offensive and disturbing content standard by describing a driver who uses mobility car parks illegally as an “arsehole”. The Authority acknowledged some viewers may find it offensive but, in the context, found it unlikely to cause widespread disproportionate offence or distress, or seriously violate widely shared community standards.

Not Upheld: Offensive and Disturbing Content


Gibbs and Radio New Zealand Limited - 2024-081 (18 December 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint that a brief Nine to Noon segment discussing the latest developments in a site investigation at the former Ivon Watkins-Dow (Dow) chemical plant in Paritūtū, New Plymouth lacked balance and accuracy. Noting the nature of the programme, the perspectives included in it and other media, and that the period of current interest for issues at Paritūtū was ongoing, the Authority found reasonable efforts were made to present significant viewpoints. The Authority also found none of the matters alleged to be inaccurate or misleading were materially inaccurate or misleading in the context.

Not Upheld: Balance, Accuracy

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

New Zealand International

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new