BSA Pānui - Focus on Privacy

Number 146
Kia ora koutou

With Privacy Week now underway it’s timely to put a spotlight on privacy in a broadcasting context.
 
Privacy is one of eight standards overseen by the BSA to help achieve our vision of freedom in broadcasting without harm.

The privacy standard applies to identifiable individuals featured in a broadcast, or directly affected by it.

The standard aims to respect, where reasonable, people’s wishes not to have themselves or their affairs broadcast to the public.

It seeks to protect their dignity, autonomy, mental wellbeing and reputation, and their ability to develop relationships, opinions and creativity away from the glare of publicity.
 
However, the privacy standard also allows broadcasters to gather, record and broadcast material where this is in the public interest.

Other key considerations include whether a person had a reasonable expectation of privacy, whether private information was disclosed, and whether the disclosure or intrusion was highly offensive.

It’s not a breach of privacy where the person concerned has given informed consent to the disclosure or intrusion.
 
More information on the privacy standard and how it applies to TV and radio broadcasts can be seen in the Broadcasting Standards Codebookopen_in_new.
 
Unlike complaints under other standards in the Codebook, privacy complaints can be made directly to the BSA, without needing to go to the broadcaster first.
 
Expectations of privacy vary with time, culture and technology, which creates some difficult boundaries. For this reason, our guidance is not exhaustive and may need elaboration or refinement when applied to a complaint.
 
The Authority may also consider privacy law developments in New Zealand and overseas in applying this standard.
 
Recent high-profile privacy rulings include a 2022 BSA decision regarding broadcasts by RNZ about a child under the care of Oranga Tamariki, which included material stolen from the former Waikato District Health Board and released by hackers on the dark web.
 
This, and a selection of other decisions upholding privacy complaints in recent years, can be seen on our website hereopen_in_new.
 
Ngā mihi mahana
Stacey Wood
Chief Executive
FEATURED DECISIONS

Muir & Knight and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 2024-008 (22 April 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld complaints that action taken by Radio New Zealand Ltd was insufficient, after the broadcaster upheld the complaints under the accuracy standard about a statement in a news bulletin that a recent ruling by the International Court of Justice had found Israel ‘not guilty of genocide.’ While the Authority agreed with the broadcaster’s decision to uphold the complaints, it found RNZ had taken sufficient steps in response to the complaints, by broadcasting an on-air correction within a reasonable period after the bulletin at issue, as well as posting a correction to its website. Other standards alleged to have been breached by the broadcast were found either not to apply or not to have been breached.

Not Upheld: Accuracy (Action Taken), Offensive and Disturbing Content, Children’s Interests, Promotion of Illegal or Antisocial Behaviour, Discrimination and Denigration, Balance, Fairness

 

Neal and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2024-018 (22 April 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint a 1News segment on James Shaw’s decision to resign as co-leader of the Green Party breached the accuracy, balance, and fairness standards for including a statement from former Prime Minister Chris Hipkins that emissions had decreased for three years in a row. The Authority found the statement was not a material fact likely to impact the audience’s understanding of the broadcast as a whole – which was focussed on Shaw’s resignation and legacy and not on emissions levels. The balance and fairness standards did not apply.

Not Upheld: Accuracy, Balance and Fairness

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

New Zealand International

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new