BSA Pānui - Framework for change

Number 134
Kia ora koutou

Today has seen the much-anticipated announcement of a proposed new framework for the regulation of online and media content in Aotearoa New Zealand, with a public discussion document now out for consultation.

At the BSA, we welcome this important announcement and launch of the discussion document, Safer Online Services and Media Platformsopen_in_new. We have long advocated for a regulatory system that has the flexibility to adapt to the changing ways New Zealanders consume content and the big shifts that continue to reshape the media sector.

Drawing on the Authority’s 33 years as a trusted media regulator, we have actively supported this review from the beginning and will continue to do so. We fundamentally support the high-level focus on developing a framework that’s concerned primarily with content rather than platforms.

This approach is vital, as it will help to future-proof any new system by enabling it to flex and adapt to ongoing changes in platforms, technology and media consumption habits.

It’s essential that a new regulatory regime must also continue to protect freedom of speech, while allowing for appropriate limits on this freedom to address harmful content.

As part of a successful co-regulatory system for over three decades, the BSA has seen the critical role media organisations play in maintaining standards and upholding the principles of free speech without harm.

We remain a supporter of a co-regulatory approach, as long as there are appropriate regulatory safeguards for dealing with non-compliance.

We look forward to contributing to the review, alongside the industry and audiences. We’ll keep in touch as the process moves forward and would welcome hearing any thoughts or concerns you may have about the future regulatory landscape.

And, of course, until a new framework is finalised and put into action, we look forward to continuing our work with broadcasters and stakeholders on a ‘business-as-usual’ footing within our existing role.

You can see our media statement welcoming the framework announcement hereopen_in_new.

Ngā mihi nui
Helen Cruse
Acting Chief Executive

FEATURED DECISIONS

FREE-TO-AIR TV


Right to Life New Zealand Inc & Kavanagh and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2023-001 (1 May 2023) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld complaints an item on Sunday breached the accuracy, balance, fairness, and discrimination and denigration standards. The broadcast featured a 30 minute report on Aotearoa New Zealand’s medical staffing shortages, and explored whether this issue could be alleviated by the migration of medical staff from the USA, particularly those dissatisfied with the Supreme Court’s recent overturning of Roe v Wade. The complainants considered the broadcast unbalanced, favouring a ‘pro-choice’ perspective. The Authority found: the programme clearly approached the topic of abortion from a specific angle and that viewers could reasonably be expected to have a level of awareness of significant arguments in the debate; the alleged inaccuracies either did not reflect the statements in the broadcast, or related to opinion which is not covered by the accuracy standard; ‘foetuses’ are not a recognised section of the community for the purpose of the discrimination and denigration standard; and the item did not treat any participant unfairly.

Not Upheld: Balance, Accuracy, Fairness, Discrimination and Denigration

RADIO


Wilberg and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 2022-071 (1 May 2023) open_in_new

The Authority has upheld an accuracy complaint about RNZ news bulletins broadcast on 19 and 20 April 2022 reporting on the Government’s apparent delay in ending the MIQ system, despite recently released public health advice from November 2021 noting that a changed risk assessment meant MIQ would no longer be justified. The Authority found the items were misleading by omission as they gave a strong impression the advice stated MIQ should be wound up immediately (rather than through a ‘carefully managed transition’ to safely shift to a new system), and the Government had acted contrary to that advice. The Authority did not uphold the complaint under the balance standard. While finely balanced, noting the standard allows balance to be achieved over time, the Authority found RNZ’s later coverage (particularly on 20 April) adequately conveyed the Government’s perspective.

Upheld: Accuracy.
Not Upheld: Balance
Order: Section 13(1)(a) broadcast statement

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new