BSA Pānui - New research on offensive language

Number 165
Kia ora koutou

Ngā mihi o te tau hou/Happy New Year! I hope you’ve had a relaxing and restful break and look forward to working with you in what promises to be another busy year ahead.

In today’s Pānui we’re sharing new researchopen_in_new that offers a valuable window into how New Zealanders’ views on offensive language in broadcasting are shifting – and what that means for audiences, broadcasters and the standards system.

Every few years we check in with the public to understand where community expectations sit. This latest update shows tolerance for strong or potentially offensive language has fallen noticeably since our last survey in 2021, partly reversing the long-term trend of softening attitudes.

The findings underline something many of you may recognise from your own experience. While regular ‘swear words’ may raise fewer eyebrows than they once did, New Zealanders increasingly object to expressions grounded in racism, misogyny, or denigration of particular groups.

Racial slurs still sit firmly at the top of the “least acceptable” list, and some terms – including the C-word, prominent in recent public debates and political contexts – have seen sharp increases in unacceptability.



The research also shows how context shapes audience expectations. People are more sensitive to offensive language in formats where the host or presenter is speaking directly to the audience, and in programmes broadcast before the 8.30pm watershed, when children are more likely to be watching or listening. Tolerance is higher in scripted entertainment or comedy, though still very dependent on the time and nature of the programme.

These insights help the BSA ensure our decisions continue to reflect community standards, and they support broadcasters in making appropriate use of language, along with classifications and audience advisoriesopen_in_new. They also serve as an important reminder that attitudes evolve and our standards system must be responsive to those shifts while continuing to support freedom of expression.

The research explores audience responses to 31 terms across 12 broadcasting contexts, providing a detailed and up‑to‑date resource for broadcasters, policymakers, and anyone interested in how New Zealanders navigate issues about harm, identity, and expression on our screens and airwaves.

You can see our media release, with a summary of key trends, demographic insights and a link to the full research report, on our website hereopen_in_new.
 

Ngā mihi mahana
Stacey Wood
Chief Executive
 
FEATURED DECISIONS


WK and The Platform Media NZ Ltd - ID2025-063 (10 December 2025) open_in_new

NZ Media Holdings 2023 Ltd, which carries on business as Reality Check Radio (RCR), applied for leave to intervene, on the question of jurisdiction, in respect of complaint 2025-063. This complaint concerns content transmitted over the internet by The Platform. RCR said it is affected by the outcome as a provider also conveying content over the internet and that the decision would have a significant impact on its business model, structure and operation. The Authority found it had power to grant such an application. Considering relevant principles, the nature of the jurisdiction issues and the parties’ submissions, leave was granted on conditions designed to ensure the timeliness of the complaints process.

Leave granted to intervene


Gibbs and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 2025-060 (17 December 2025) open_in_new

The Authority has not upheld a complaint about a Midday Report segment on Charlie Kirk’s death, which included a recording of Kirk’s final interaction and the gunshot which killed him. The complainant considered it offensive and lacking in decency to broadcast Kirk’s final moments. In the context, including comments alerting listeners to the pending content, the Authority found it was unlikely to disproportionately offend or disturb the Midday Report audience. Those who did not wish to listen were given a reasonable opportunity to turn the programme off. Noting the significant public interest in the segment, the Authority also found no harm justifying its intervention to limit the broadcaster’s freedom of expression. The privacy standard did not apply.

Not Upheld: Offensive and Disturbing Content, Privacy

 

LATEST DECISIONS

 
 

NEWS AND RESEARCH

New Zealand International

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new