BSA Pānui - To the point

Number 117
Kia ora koutou,

A very short note to say a big thank you to everyone for your help in 2021.

Below you will find the Authority's last decisions for the year. Our office will be closed from December 24 and reopens on January 10.

In the New Year we will be back in touch to begin public consultation on a new draft of our code. 

We wish you, your family and friends, a safe, happy, healthy and relaxing Kirihimete.

Ngā mihi nui
Glen
Chief Executive
glens@bsa.govt.nz

FEATURED DECISIONS

FREE-TO-AIR TELEVISION

Clark & Sallee and Apna Television Ltd - 2021-081 (20 December 2021) open_in_new

The Authority has found aspects of Talanoa Sa’o breached the accuracy standard. While parts of the programme were opinion, comment or analysis to which the standard does not apply, it did contain incorrect statements of fact, false assertions, and omissions of information which would materially mislead viewers (particularly through implication). The programme created the incorrect impression that social housing will only be provided to people who are vaccinated against COVID-19; that hydroxychloroquine is an effective COVID-19 treatment and the Government has deliberately prevented New Zealanders from accessing it; and that a baby was born after an attempted abortion and left to die as a result of recently amended abortion laws. The broadcaster did not provide evidence of reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the programme.

Upheld: Accuracy

Orders: Section 13(1)(a) – broadcast statement; Section 16(4) – $500 costs to the Crown

RADIO

Glen and MediaWorks Radio Ltd - 2021-128 ( 20 December 2021) open_in_new

An announcer on The Edge Breakfast recounted an experience at her antenatal class where she discussed how to address constipation post childbirth. The complaint was this segment breached the good taste and decency and children’s interests standards. The Authority did not uphold the complaint, taking into account the programme’s target audience, audience expectations, and the low-level language complained about (being of an anatomical, rather than a profane or sexual nature).

Not Upheld: Good Taste and Decency and Children’s Interests

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new