BSA Pānui - Updated guidance - accuracy standard


Number 145
Kia ora koutou

In response to feedback from broadcasters and audiences seeking to smooth the complaints process, the BSA maintains guidance on types of complaints that are unlikely to be upheld.

This sits alongside other BSA guidance on the broadcasting standards and how to make a complaint, and seeks to save complainants, broadcasters and the BSA from using time and resources dealing with complaints with little chance of succeeding.

Our Complaints Unlikely to Succeedopen_in_new guide covers subjects ranging from the use of te reo Māori (not a standards issue) through to balance (over time), personal preference, low-level offensive language and adult content outside kids’ viewing times.

New accuracy guidance

Our guidance on complaints unlikely to be upheld is based on past BSA decisions, and we keep it under review in light of ongoing decisions.

With accuracy regularly rating as the most complained-about broadcasting standard, we’ve now added a section noting that not every inaccuracy triggers a breach of this standard.

Accuracy complaints won’t succeed if the inaccuracy is technical or immaterial and unlikely to significantly affect understanding of the broadcast as a whole, or of the main point(s).

Our updated guide offers further explanation, along with examples of decisions illustrating this point.

The accuracy standard was cited in over half of the 154 complaints we determined last year, and has often been raised in relation to misinformation around COVID-19 and other controversial subjects.

This standard only applies to news, current affairs or factual programming. It states programmes should be accurate with 'material points of fact' and should not mislead, and requires broadcasters to correct significant errors within a reasonable period.

You can see the full updated ‘Complaints that are unlikely to succeed’ guide on our website hereopen_in_new. This is available in several languages, with translations now underway to incorporate the latest addition.

Here to help

Another way we help broadcasters, students and stakeholder groups with their understanding of the broadcasting standards system is by holding regular educational or training workshops.

This is also a great chance for us to get out and understand what’s happening at the coalface and what’s top-of-mind for broadcasters and other groups.

We’ve recently run successful sessions with the teams at NZME and Whakaata Māori and media, communications and law students at The University of Canterbury and AUT.

If you’d like us to help bring new recruits up to speed about the standards, or would like a refresher, please don't hesitate to be in touch at info@bsa.govt.nz, or call us on 0800 366 996.
 
Ngā mihi mahana
Stacey Wood
Chief Executive
FEATURED DECISIONS
 

Wilson and NZME Radio Ltd - 2023-085 (8 April 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has upheld a complaint that comments made by Kate Hawkesby on Early Edition with Kate Hawkesby, about the newly introduced Equity Adjustor Score in the Auckland region, were misleading. The Equity Adjustor Score is a system which uses five categories to place patients on the non-urgent surgical waitlist, including clinical priority, time spent waiting, location, deprivation level and ethnicity. Hawkesby made statements to the effect that the Score meant Māori and Pacific Peoples were being ‘moved to the top of surgery waitlists’. The Authority found the comments to be materially misleading in relation to the nature and impact of the Score, as they gave the impression that ethnicity was the only, or the key factor, involved in the assessment, and that Māori and Pacific patients would be given immediate precedence on the surgical waitlist as a result, when this was not the case. It also found the comments breached the discrimination and denigration standard, by reinforcing the stereotype that Māori and Pacific Peoples disproportionately take up resources and are given undeserved special treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand’s society, at the expense of other ethnicities.

Upheld: Accuracy, Discrimination and Denigration

Orders: Section 13(1)(a) broadcast statement; Section 16(4) - $1,500 costs to the Crown

 

Garbutt and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2024-013 (20 March 2024) open_in_new

The Authority has declined to determine a complaint alleging 1News breached the balance standard by failing to cover comments made by Labour MP Ginny Andersen. The Authority found in all the circumstances the complaint should not be determined as it amounted to the complainant’s personal preference regarding matters of editorial discretion.

Declined to determine (section 11(b) in all the circumstances): Balance

LATEST DECISIONS

NEWS AND RESEARCH

New Zealand International

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new