BSA Pānui - January 2020

Bulletin Number 97

Message from the Chief Executive


Tēnā koutou and happy new year.
 
This is our first Pānui for 2020 and it is packed with guidance from the Authority with thirteen decisions being released since the December edition. A number of complaints have raised complex and challenging issues, particularly on issues of balance, accuracy and fairness.  I encourage all broadcasters to read these decisions.

The Authority and staff team hit the ground running after the summer break as we gear up for changes to some of our broadcasting Codes and election year. As we have noted in previous decisions about election content, broadcasters play an important role in reporting on election issues and broadcasting election programmes which encourage discourse and discussion that is essential to a healthy democracy. The broadcasting standards system recognises that this role also carries responsibilities and the broadcasting codes, and particularly our election programmes code, provides guidance to broadcasters as to how to fulfil those responsibilities in an election year. We look forward to supporting broadcasters to meet their obligations. We have completed consultation on the refreshed Election Programmes Code and this will be available on our website in February and will be gazetted to take effect from 1 March 2020.  

In addition, in the coming weeks we will announce the outcome of our review of timebands and classifications on free-to-air television and we will commence consultation on amendments to the Broadcasting Standards in New Zealand Codebook, particularly the free-to-air television code, to reflect the changes to be made. 
 
Please keep an eye out for information about both of these code reviews on the consultation section of our websiteopen_in_new.
 
We look forward to working with broadcasters, and all of our stakeholders, and serving the community in the year ahead.

Ngā mihi
 
Belinda

Over the Last Month

During December and January
  • The Authority published thirteen broadcasting standards decisionsopen_in_new.
  • We finalised our refreshed Election Programmes Code which will be released shortly. We also reached the final phase in our review of timebands and classifications on free-to-air television.
  • We issued a paper outlining our views on the application of the Broadcasting Act to some categories of online content (excluding on demand content). We are looking forward to working with those who have provided us with feedback, and with policy officials on the issues raised with us.

Latest Decisions

Decisions issued since our December Pānui are available on our website, and include:
Complaints about Pay Television Broadcasts
Phillips and Racing Industry Transition Agency - 2019-044 (22 January 2020) open_in_new

The Authority has upheld a complaint that two episodes of The Box Seat breached the accuracy and balance standards of the Pay TV Code of Broadcasting Standards. The Authority found that the segments about blood spinning in harness racing covered a controversial issue of public importance but failed to include balancing views on the issue being discussed or indicate that the programmes were presented from a specific perspective. The Authority also found that, although the broadcasts did not contain any specific factual inaccuracies, the omission of alternative perspectives and information on the safety and propriety of blood spinning meant that the broadcast was misleading as a whole. The Authority did not uphold the complaint under the fairness standard. The Authority considered the publication of this decision sufficient to censure the breach of standards by the broadcaster and made no orders.

Upheld: Balance, Accuracy. Not upheld: Fairness. No orders

Complaints about Radio Broadcasts

The majority of the Authority did not uphold a complaint that a comment made by Mike Hosking during a ‘Mike’s Minute’ segment of Mike Hosking Breakfast about the government’s surplus breached the accuracy standard. The majority found that, considering a number of contextual factors, the statement was one of comment and political analysis, the type of which is common in news and current affairs broadcasts to which the accuracy standard does not apply. The minority view was that Mr Hosking’s comment was an inaccurate statement of fact on which he then based his opinion and that the broadcaster did not make reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the statement on which the following comments were based.

Not Upheld by Majority: Accuracy

Media News

In this section we provide a range of recent publications that are relevant to the broadcasting sector: 

New Zealand 

Jacinda Ardern promises Facebook and fiscal transparency for election 2020 open_in_new

Cheeky ad lands supermarket in hot wateropen_in_new

Future uncertain for all five big news outletsopen_in_new

Netsafe numbers point to problems with excessive internet use by teensopen_in_new

Love Island UK is coming back but you'll have to pay to see it on NEON open_in_new

What to watch: 2020's big dramas coming to Kiwi cinemas open_in_new

International

BBC defends Gavin & Stacey Christmas special after nearly 900 complaints open_in_new

PC Specialist Ad Banned in UK Because it Doesn’t Feature Women open_in_new

Australia's Seven said to be close to buying MediaWorks' TV business open_in_new

 

Subscribe to the BSA Pānui newsletteropen_in_new