BSA Decisions Ngā whakatau a Te Mana Whanonga Kaipāho

All BSA's decisions on complaints 1990-present

All Decisions
Harang and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1992-068

TV One. Advertisement for stereo equipment. Complaint that ad used sexual appeal to sell an unrelated electronic product. Upheld (majority): discrimination and denigration (breach of standard 4 of the Code for the Portrayal of People in Advertising). Not upheld (good taste and decency). No order.

Rothville and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 1992-066

Valley Girls and Eye of the Needle promos. Promos broadcast in programme between 6.30pm and 7.30pm were for films to be broadcast at a later hour and showed respectively a murder scene and sexual behaviour. Upheld (children's interests, violence): Eye of the Needle promo. Not upheld (good taste and decency, responsible programming): Eye of the Needle promo. Not upheld (good taste and decency, children's interests, responsible programming, violence): Valley Girls promo. No order.

Smits and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 1992-063

Advertisements for bars and nightclubs broadcast on 1ZB. Alleged promotion of Bangkok nightlife. Not upheld (good taste and decency, discrimination and denigration).

Smits and Radio Pacific Ltd - 1992-064

Radip Pacific advertisement for bars and massage parlours with topless staff. Complaint about reference to Bangkok and its nightlife. Not upheld (good taste and decency, discrimination and denigration).