Showing 1 - 6 of 6 results.
Summary [This summary does not form part of the decision.]The Authority has not upheld a complaint alleging a segment on Police Ten 7 breached the discrimination and denigration standard. A man called a woman who had called the police a ‘nosey motherf***ing white c***’.
Mr D, although he was named as Paul Williams, was clearly identifiable in the item broadcast on Police Ten 7 dealing with his encounter with the police. [13] The Authority then considers whether any of the privacy principles it applies are applicable to the situation dealt with in an item.
She went on to say that the complainant’s wife understood that the filming was for Police Ten 7 and that “she thought her husband would be ‘OK’ with filming.
On this occasion, the relevant contextual factors include: Police Ten 7 was broadcast at 7.30pm during children’s viewing times it was classified PGR the programme was preceded by a written and verbal warning for language that may offend, indicating the programme may not be suitable for younger viewers and advising parental guidance the programme’s adult target audience expectations of regular viewers Police Ten 7 is a long-running and well-known series. [7] In our view, Police Ten 7 is designed
I don’t recall being told that the filming was for Police Ten 7. I think that even at that stage if they had said ‘Police Ten 7’, I probably wouldn’t have associated it with the TV programme. I don’t watch much TV... I hadn’t ever seen Police Ten 7 before I saw the episode with me in it.
Introduction [1] A segment on Police Ten 7 profiled an aggravated robbery of a bar in Christchurch. Viewers were told that it was committed by three men, two armed with guns and one armed with a crowbar. The segment included security footage of the robbery, outlined the facts of the case, and outlined ways that viewers may be able to help police identify the offenders. The presenter said: Now we’ve got some good descriptions of these guys. Let’s start with the main offender.