Showing 1121 - 1140 of 1179 results.
He wrote:TVNZ is well aware that this matter was taken right to the brink of High Courtaction prior to the TVNZ Director of Production agreeing to edit the programme -an offer which was overruled.He concluded:The clip of me was filmed over 12 months prior to the screening when no problemof the association of my likeness and name in a national broadcast existed.
It quoted the opening sequence, filmed on Australia’s Gold Coast, as follows: Commentator: Manpower Australia is the most successful male revue in the world because of this man, Billy Cross.Billy Cross: This is where I did my first strip about twelve years ago, and now I own it.Commentator: And now he’s coming to New Zealand to begin a national strip-search for Kiwi men. [20] In TVNZ’s view, what the series was about was "encapsulated
Mrs Stokes noted that media coverage of the broadcast, both nationally and internationally, continues to be available and the audio of the original broadcast is still accessible on the UK Daily Mail website.[45] Mrs Stokes submitted that the following orders would be appropriate:privacy compensation of $5,000 a broadcast statement orders for the Hauraki Breakfast Show to refrain from broadcasting, or broadcast without advertising programmes, for a period of time. [46] Mrs Stokes expressly stated
Strong evidence is needed and the option of anonymisation needs to be considered.[51] We, the minority, have therefore come to the conclusion that the complainant was not treated fairly, by being identified in a news item on national television as a person who had undertaken criminal behaviour. We do not wish to see the freedom of journalists and broadcasters unduly limited, but our role is to weigh that freedom against the harm caused by the broadcast.
We all make mistakes even when we are broadcasting nationally but not every mistake leads people... to question the integrity and ethics of those involved when they have publicly, clearly and unambiguously accepted their error. [46] TVWorks reiterated its argument that there was no breach of broadcasting standards and that "to find one would be an extraordinary overreaction to what was a simple, understandable, straightforward and quickly acknowledged mistake".
Secondly, it is suggested that a third party, namely the vendor of the faulty vehicle, is in some way taking legal action against Mr Kemp.They emphasised that the parties had consented to the Tribunal's Order and asked:How then, when the money is voluntarily offered to Mr Kemp, can a reporter possibly suggest on national television that the vendor is suing, or taking legal action against our client.In these circumstances, the solicitors concluded, TVNZ had made no effort to acknowledge its error
The issue received national attention from the media, was raised in Parliament and has brought Ngapotiki and Ngati Pukenga under much doubt around the country as to the issue and integrity of the registration of Kopukairoa. There is also a petition circulating around Tauranga calling for the registration of Kopukairoa as a wāhi tapu under the Historic Places Act to be revoked. [23] The complainant detailed why Mr Paraire did not have the standing to speak on behalf of the Hapu or the Iwi.
Itacknowledges that his work has been recognised by his peers, for which he has receivedsome national and international awards, due to its potential to save the lives of babieswith certain birth defects.
Uh, we have palliative care in our nation but it’s only, a portion of that is funded by government and there’s not that many specialists out there. There’s some big issues that we need to address.Mulligan: The truth is we probably won’t get another go at this right? So if people have been wanting change in the law in this area, shouldn’t they just vote yes even if it’s not perfect?
It is obvious that whoever gets footage out first will have the advantage of exposure in the early stages of media coverage… if the first footage takes the form of terrorist propaganda, then no matter how hellish or sensational it is, there is an added ethical duty to minimise what might be called “first footage advantage”.[79] We have also been guided by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation’s (UNESCO) Terrorism and the Media: A Handbook for Journalists, which states
‘[His past] would not be brought up in a criminal court and exposed to the public…to raise someone’s past and to air it on national television is outright scurrilous and has no bearing on building fences.’ ‘Public humiliation has serious [effects] on the health and wellbeing of the individual, family and friends.’ Opportunity to respond‘There [was] no right of reply for the other side of the story.’
Taking into account the Media Council’s role as a public-facing organisation, the Authority noted it can reasonably expect its decisions to be subject to public scrutiny, and found the critique of its decision did not result in unfairness.Not Upheld: Balance, Accuracy, FairnessThe broadcast[1] During an item of Midweek Mediawatch, broadcast on 31 May 2023 on RNZ National, the hosts Hayden Donnell and Mark Leishman discussed a recently released decision of the Media Council.1 The decision concerned
Inc and Television New Zealand Ltd, Decision No 2022-005, at [12]12 See Carapiet and Radio New Zealand Ltd, Decision No 2022-033 for a similar finding13 See NZDSOS Inc and Television New Zealand Ltd, Decision No 2022-005, at [16]14 Guideline 9d15 Medsafe “Adverse reactions to Medicines” (22 May 2022) <medsafe.govt.nz>16NZDSOS Inc and Television New Zealand Ltd, Decision No 2022-005, at [21]17 Health Direct “Hormone replacement theory” (accessed 3 October 2022) <healthdirect.govt.au>18 National
Other Correspondence: TV3 Response to Mrs Gardner – 11 September 1997In response to Mrs Gardner's complaint about the use of pictures of her son and thesite where he was buried, TV3 wrote:I must inform you a full and complete archive is essential to any newsorganisation and is there to be used appropriately to inform viewers as andwhen that archive material is relevant and is of legitimate public interest.3 National News and Current Affairs can not accede to requests to delete orlimit archive material
Selected Studies Reported Health Effects Formaldehyde Concentrations (PPM) None reported 0.05 Odour Threshold 0.05-1.0 Eye irritation* 0.01-2.0 Upper airway irritation/increased nasal airway resistance 0.1-25 Lower airway and chronic pulmonary obstruction 5-30 Pulmonary edema, inflammation, pneumonia 50-100 Death 100+ *Eye irritation reports if formaldehyde levels of 0.01 PPM occurred during exposure with other pollutants The United States National
Statement that HDL to total cholesterol ratio should always be 4.5 or less; participant’s had fallen from 5.1 to 4.1. [17] NZDA agreed that the ratio should be 4.5 or less as recommended by the New Zealand National Heart Foundation. However, that ratio was calculated as total cholesterol to HDL, not the other way around.
Its disclosure on national television without his consent was therefore in our view highly offensive.Public interest[102] Having found the broadcast breached the CEO’s privacy, we now look at whether any defences are available to TVNZ under this standard.[103] Guideline 10f to the privacy standard states that it is a defence to a privacy complaint to publicly disclose matters of legitimate public interest.
Naturally, the owners were surprised by the unannounced visit and the reporter’s request for an interview, the contents of which would presumably be broadcast on prime-time national television.
Six weeks is not long to see your loved ones on national television dead in a car and dead on the side of the road. This has been one of the most heartbreaking, painful experiences in my life, and my family's lives. I feel showing this programme has taken away our rights as a family and Carl and Jake's rights for privacy and respect.
11 December 2017 21 TVNZ’s response to the complaint – 20 December 2017 22 Mr Power’s referral to the Authority – 20 December 2017 23 TVNZ’s response to the Authority – 27 February 2018Kate Rooney’s formal complaint24 Kate Rooney’s formal complaint – 11 December 2017 25 TVNZ’s response to the complaint – 20 December 2017 26 Ms Rooney’s referral to the Authority – 20 December 2017 27 TVNZ’s response to the Authority – 27 February 20181 Reporting status for New Zealand, CCPR, United Nations