Showing 1161 - 1178 of 1178 results.
It emphasised that the rural address would have meant nothing to a national audience, whereas Shantytown did. TVNZ emphasised that Fair Go made numerous attempts to contact the company, despite Mr Palmer's claim to the contrary. It noted that none of the documents from the firm carried either a cellphone or fax number, and that there was no reply from the telephone number. 8–9.
In doing so, it planted Wainuiomata very firmly in the national consciousness, and not at all in a negative way. No one outside the valley will imagine for a moment that the engaging Chloe is representative of Wainui womanhood, or that Wainui housewives any more than housewives elsewhere, hunger for erotic stimulation with well muscled male strippers.
Clearly Mr Rothel’s reaction might well have been quite different had he known that those allegations would be aired against him on national television.The reporter – according to Mr Rothel – described the allegations to him as serious.
As the programmes were watched by a national audience she maintained that the effects of the 'bad publicity' were widespread and included hateful comments posted online.
Even [Detective Inspector] Rob Pope stated on national television, Mr Hunter hasn’t discovered anything new. I would like to state the obvious that nothing in Keith Hunter’s programme proves Watson is innocent, no Mystery Ketch was found, no corruption was found and no hard evidence was produced to warrant an acquittal or a retrial, what’s more TVNZ knew all this before they aired the programme.
The first wasmade by Mr Gary Mabey, manager of Health and Herbs (a health food company) andpresident of the National Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA).
TVNZ said it was surprised that ACC had chosen "to attack the programme on National Radio and Newstalk ZB" rather than "engage in a comprehensive discussion on [the] important issues". [72] Next, TVNZ said that the reality of ACC approved counselling was that although: Ms Munro may not be an actual ACC employee, there can be no doubt that in everyday parlance she would commonly be known and accepted by a claimant as an "ACC Counsellor". That is the reality. She was ACC approved.
In a fax dated 24 August, TVNZ referred the Authority to an article in the National Business Review which reported that FHL was still considering whether to take defamation action against TVNZ. In those circumstances, TVNZ advised that it believed the Authority should defer further consideration of the complaint until either there was a resolution of any proceedings issued by FHL against TVNZ, or FHL advised that it would not be issuing such proceedings.
[170] TVNZ later drew the Authority’s attention to items in the National Business Review on 18 and 25 October, and in the New Zealand Herald on 22 October which reported that the Authority had upheld aspects of Mr Hide’s complaint.
(See United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child – Appendix 3) The Broadcaster’s Response to the Complainant [29] TV3 declined to uphold the complaint. In its response to the complainant, it identified three groups affected by the broadcast – CYFS, the children, and social workers. TV3 considered the nominated broadcasting standards in respect of each of these groups.
Let's be really clear what the alternatives are.[16] A follow-up item on 1 News on 5 September 2022 reported that following the Sunday programme, there had been calls from the National Party and Te Pāti Māori to investigate the government agencies and contractors dealing with Rotorua’s emergency housing. It included the following comment from a Visions board member:We try and maintain a drug-free, an alcohol-free and a violence-free environment.
Accepting that views on the issues raised in the item were polarised, TVNZ enclosed a fax from Mr Orr of the National Meat and Wool Council.
As stated in the final ESR report: "A statistically significant elevation in serum TCDD [dioxin] compared to national TCDD serum concentrations was found in the combined study group of 52 participants".
The EMA no doubt felt uncomfortable discussing their employment of the CE on national television. Given the unfair way he was treated the previous evening it is understandable that Mr Thompson did not return. However Campbell Live had the full 23 June interview and the ability therefore to deal with Mr Thompson fairly and at least summarise his stated opinions correctly. [153] As it was, no one represented Mr Thompson or correctly stated his views.
Noel Mosen was stated to have been involved in the Gay Rights Coalition.Mr Sawyers attached press releases of 4 November 1985 which showed that his namewas not on the records of the National Gay Rights Coalition. He maintained MrMosen's claims were false and that better investigative reporting would haveuncovered those facts. (Standard G1)3.
He considered that it was therefore obvious that: a) Mr Drury did not consent to be filmed and may not have even been asked if he could be filmed.b) Mr Drury was not told after the interview that the film had been taken.c) Mr Drury was not advised that the film was to be shown on national television and therefore his consent was not obtained for the screening.d) The film is now stored in the company's archives and might be used again without Mr Drury's consent.
He hadwritten a reference (also attached) which referred to her management of breast cancerand she had delivered a paper (also enclosed) to the National Surgical NursesConference in 1994. TV3 concluded on this point:The basis of HCO's criticism of the inference that Ms Gousmett was employedin that capacity by HCO is unjustified. Further, it is beside the real point; Thefact is Ms Gousmett is or was part of a 'team'. That 'team' delivered 'breastcare'.
Ms Rutherford considered it was contravened by the accusatory methods of interview which suggested that the Prime Minister was lying about something of great importance to the nation. The interviewer’s aggressive tone, she added, transgressed Guideline 8b relating to subliminal perception.