BSA Decisions Ngā whakatau a Te Mana Whanonga Kaipāho

All BSA's decisions on complaints 1990-present

All Decisions
M and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-132

Inside New Zealand. Documentary about debtors and debt recovery workers showed a debt recovery worker outside the home of a couple with a number of children, who were said to have a debt of $1600. Upheld (privacy). Order ($500 compensation to complainant).

James and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-125

Dateline. "Safe and natural" plant estrogens were said to offer relief for symptoms of menopause. Complaint that the programme was inaccurate and unbalanced. Not upheld (accuracy, balance).

Tonks and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-126

3 News. A dietary supplement  was said to provide a possible cure for cancer. Complaint that the item lacked scientific credibility and used a deceptive programme practice and was misleading, as it could have raised false hopes for cancer sufferers. Not relevant (responsible programming). Not upheld (accuracy).

Hill and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-123

3 News. Item about Parihaka commemoration. Complaint that item did not provide full and accurate information about the history of Parihaka, and that it had been unbalanced and biased in favour of the Parihaka Maori as a result. Not upheld (accuracy: further historical information not required).

Harang and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-124

Documentary New Zealand series: "The Complainers". Programme showed a woman’s breasts and a man’s genitals. Complaint that the nudity was offensive behaviour. Not upheld (good taste and decency, children's interests).

Cockram and The RadioWorks Ltd - 2000-114, 2000-115

Radio Pacific talkback. Complaint that host made misleading comments about Tranz Rail and its safety record, then the next day broadcast comments about the complainant, who had written to Radio Pacific about the broadcast. Upheld (fairness, accuracy). Order (broadcast of statement).