BSA Decisions Ngā whakatau a Te Mana Whanonga Kaipāho

All BSA's decisions on complaints 1990-present

All Decisions
Zacharias and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-085

3 News. Comment by sports presenter about player and his team-mates "milking" an injury during an incident in a rugby match. Not upheld (accuracy, fairness). Subsumed (where relevant) under accuracy or fairness (law and order, balance, responsible programming, children's interests, violence).

Owen and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-086

Holmes. Interview with a Waitara couple who were eye-witnesses of Waitara shooting. Complaint that the interview was tantamount to "trial by television". Not upheld (law and order, balance).

Parsonson and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 2000-079

3 News. Footage showing capture and shooting of Bengali tiger included footage of a vet who was trying to shoot the tiger with a tranquiliser gun being accidentally shot and killed. Upheld: majority (children's interests, violence). No order.

Hobo and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-081

One News. File footage of an unconscious and partly naked man then suffering from meningococcal meningitis. Complaint that the footage breached the man’s privacy. Not upheld (privacy: facts not highly offensive and objectionable, public interest and consent defences).

PHARMAC and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-082

Holmes. Item discussed availability of an effective treatment for acne and interviewed a dermatologist and a doctor, as well as two young people who had both been successfully treated by a named drug. Complaint that the broadcast was misleading and unbalanced, and concern expressed that the broadcaster had been used to promote a prescription medicine. Declined to determine (balance – not controversial issue to which the standard applies). Not upheld (other standards – not relevant).