BSA Decisions Ngā whakatau a Te Mana Whanonga Kaipāho

All BSA's decisions on complaints 1990-present

All Decisions
Collier and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-010

Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man. Action movie in which two men stole mob money to prevent their friend’s bar from being closed down. Complaint that the film contained language and "gross violence" that breached broadcasting standards. Not upheld (good taste and decency, violence).

Boyce and Clow and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-011, 2000-012, 2000-013

Havoc 2000 Deluxe. Included a sequence in which a young man was shown stapling his genitals to a cross and then setting it alight. The programme the following week referred to the incident and the complaints it had generated. The original programme also included a sequence where one of the presenters asked a woman on the street if she would consider "a blow-job for four [dollars]". Not upheld (film of genitals being nailed to piece of wood, and programme a week later that referred to it: good taste and decency). Not upheld: majority (the question put to the woman: good taste and decency).

Brooke and Radio New Zealand Ltd - 2000-001

National Radio: Kim Hill. Editor of recently published first issue of "The Best Underground Press – Critical Review" interviewed by Kim Hill. Claimed interviewer was rude and antagonistic, treated her unfairly, did not give her an opportunity to advance her opinions, and there were some inaccuracies in the interviewer’s comments. Not upheld (balance, fairness, social responsibility).

Department of Conservation and Radio Pacific Ltd - 2000-002

John Banks Breakfast Show. Host expressed his strong displeasure at Department of Conservation's management programme which involved the shooting of thar (mountain goats). Upheld (good taste and decency, fairness). Orders (broadcast of statement, $500 costs to Crown).

Powell and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-006

ACT Party political advertisement referred to ACT's and National's policies for resolving Treaty claims. Complaint that ACT was disseminating incorrect and unconstitutional information Declined to determine.